Safety Data Sheets (SDSs) are critical documents in the chemical industry. They serve as the cornerstone of hazard communication, ensuring that manufacturers, workers, transporters, and regulators understand the risks associated with chemical substances and mixtures. As global supply chains grow more complex, and regulatory environments more stringent, the importance of having SDSs in the correct format for each market has never been greater.

Although the Globally Harmonized System (GHS) aims to standardize SDS structure and content, actual implementation varies significantly by country. This poses a challenge for chemical manufacturers operating internationally. Failing to meet region-specific SDS format requirements can lead to shipment rejections, regulatory penalties, or worse—compromised safety for users and workers.

This article explores the structure of SDSs, key differences in regional formats, and how digital tools like Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) systems and AI can streamline SDS compliance.

1. What Is an SDS and Why Format Matters

An SDS (formerly known as MSDS) is a document that provides comprehensive information about a chemical substance or mixture. It includes data on physical and chemical properties, potential hazards, safe handling practices, emergency control measures, and environmental impact.

While all SDSs are designed to communicate this vital information, the format is not universally fixed. The layout, content depth, language, and even the terminology used can differ across regulatory regimes. For multinational manufacturers, this diversity in formatting is a risk factor that must be managed proactively.

For example, a company shipping the same product to the U.S., EU, Brazil, and India must prepare SDSs that meet the specific regulatory expectations of each jurisdiction, even if the chemical composition does not change.

2. GHS and the 16-Section SDS Format

The GHS provides the foundational template for modern SDSs. It recommends a standardized 16-section format that includes:

Identification
Hazard Identification
Composition/Information on Ingredients
First-Aid Measures
Fire-Fighting Measures
Accidental Release Measures
Handling and Storage
Exposure Controls/Personal Protection
Physical and Chemical Properties
Stability and Reactivity
Toxicological Information
Ecological Information
Disposal Considerations
Transport Information
Regulatory Information
Other Information

While many countries base their SDS regulations on the GHS structure, they often introduce their own additions or modifications—particularly around language, labeling symbols, and required data fields.

Download a SDS Model:

3. Regional Differences in SDS Formats

United States (OSHA / HazCom 2012)

SDSs must follow GHS-aligned 16-section format.
English language is mandatory.
Enforced under OSHA’s 29 CFR 1910.1200.
Requires detailed emergency contact info and updated hazard communication elements.

European Union (REACH & CLP)

Must comply with REACH Regulation (EC No 1907/2006).
Requires SDSs in the official language of each EU country.
SDS must include registration numbers, exposure scenarios, and extended safety data.

Brazil (ABNT NBR 14725)

SDSs follow ABNT NBR 14725-4 standard.
Must be written in Portuguese.
Requires clear classification and labeling in accordance with Brazilian GHS implementation.
Overseen by ANVISA and Ministry of Labor.

India (MSIHC Rules, 1989)

SDSs must comply with Rule 18 of the MSIHC Rules.
Format aligns partially with GHS.
Must be in English.
Requires local contact information, emergency measures, and specific hazard details for storage and transportation.

China (GB/T 16483-2008)

SDSs must be written in Simplified Chinese.
Must follow GHS structure but with additional local requirements.
Overseen by State Administration of Work Safety.

Japan (Industrial Safety and Health Law)

Adopts GHS structure with local adaptations.
Regulated by METI and MHLW.
SDSs must be in Japanese and include chemical classification per Japan’s own criteria.

South Korea (MoEL Regulations)

Governed by the Ministry of Employment and Labor (MoEL).
SDSs must be submitted electronically and in Korean.
Requires local company address and Korean-specific hazard classifications.
Importers must validate and re-classify substances if necessary.

4. Challenges in Managing SDS Formats at Scale

With such variation in requirements, managing SDSs across multiple jurisdictions is a significant burden. Companies may face:

Language translation issues that introduce misinterpretations.
Version control problems across different markets.
Compliance risks when SDSs are outdated or missing country-specific sections.
Operational inefficiency when SDS creation is siloed and disconnected from formulation changes.

Manual approaches (e.g., editing Word or PDF templates) are not sustainable for businesses operating across continents. Companies need systems that can dynamically generate and update SDSs based on the latest regulatory frameworks.

5. How PLM and AI Simplify SDS Management

Modern PLM systems provide a centralized platform for product data, including formulation details, raw material specs, hazard classifications, and regulatory documentation. By integrating SDS workflows into the PLM environment, companies can:

Generate SDS drafts automatically when a new formulation is created or changed.
Maintain version history and ensure consistency across product lines.
Link SDS updates to change management processes, ensuring regulatory oversight.

AI enhances this process by:

Classifying chemical hazards based on composition.
Recommending label elements and pictograms.
Identifying compliance gaps for each target region.
Translating SDS content while preserving regulatory language.

Platforms like Chemcopilot can automate SDS generation using built-in regulatory logic, drastically reducing human error and administrative time. This is especially valuable for small companies and consultants managing multiple compliance schemes simultaneously.

6. Best Practices for SDS Compliance

To ensure SDS compliance across markets, chemical manufacturers should:

Localize SDSs for each jurisdiction, not just translate.
Use version control tools embedded in their PLM systems.
Validate changes in formulations against local hazard rules.
Train staff on regional SDS formatting requirements.
Connect SDS processes to digital formulation platforms like Chemcopilot to reduce manual intervention.

Conclusion

Safety Data Sheets are much more than static documents—they are living compliance artifacts that evolve alongside formulations, regulations, and global markets. Understanding specific SDS formats and how they differ between countries is essential for avoiding regulatory penalties, protecting users, and maintaining trust with partners and customers.

Digital tools like PLM systems and AI are no longer optional—they are essential enablers of efficient and error-free SDS management. Platforms like Chemcopilot empower chemical companies of all sizes to streamline their compliance efforts, manage risk, and deliver safer products to a global market.

Understanding Specific Safety Data Sheet (SDS) Formats: A Guide for Chemical Manufacturers